Document Type : Final File


1 Faculty of Earth sciences, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Islamic Republic of Iran

2 Department of Geology, Faculty of sciences, University of Shahid Bahonar, Kerman, Islamic Republic of Iran


This study was carried out in the Ravar plain, a typical arid zone in southeastern Iran, with the objectives of evaluating hydrochemical quality of the groundwater resources and identifying the processes that modify the groundwater composition. Groundwater samples were collected from representative wells spread over the study area. Major cations and anions along with physico-chemical parameters were measured as per the standard methods. The study approach includes conventional graphical plots and multivariate analysis of the hydrochemical data to define the hydrogeochemical evaluation of groundwater system based on the ionic constituents, water types and hydrochemical facies. The results indicated that the groundwater in the study area is alkaline (pH 7.1–7.8), hard (TH 350-4000 mg/l) and brackish (TDS 868–13000 mg/l). The Chadha’s diagram shows that the prevalent water type is Na–Cl–SO4, with alkali metals exceeding the alkaline earth metals. Gibbs and Durov diagrams as well as ionic ratio plots indicated that evaporation, water–rock interaction and ion exchange are the main processes that regulate the groundwater quality. It was also found that the majority of groundwater samples are undersaturated with respect to evaporitic minerals and oversaturated with respect to carbonate minerals. The application of principal component analysis resulted in two PCs. PC I with loading on Cl-, Na+, SO4-2, EC, and Ca+2 which is related to degree of groundwater mineralization while PC II with opposite loadings of HCO3- and pH. The findings of the study may be applicable to areas with similar characteristics elsewhere in arid regions.


Main Subjects

1. Ward D. The Biology of Deserts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
2. Clark I. Groundwater Geochemistry and Isotopes. CRC press, New York (2015).
3.Appelo C.A.J. and Postma D. Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution. CRC press, Amsterdam (2005).
4.Modarres R. and Da Silva V.P.R. Rainfall trends in arid and semi-arid regions of Iran. J. Arid .Environ. 70: 344–355 (2007).
5.Mahdavi A.E., Aghanabati A., Sohieli M., Mohajel M., Huckriede R. and Haj Mola Ali, A. Geological quadrangle map of Ravar (scale 1:250000). Geological survey of Iran, Tehran (1996).
6.Stocklin J. Lagoonal formations and salt domes in East Iran. Bull. Iran. Pertrol. Instit. 3: 29–46 (1961).
7.APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st ed. Washington: American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation. p.541 (2005).
8.Chadha D.K. A proposed new diagram for geochemical classification of natural waters and interpretation of chemical data. Hydrogeol. J. 7: 431–439 (1999).
9.Hassen I., Hamzaoui-Azaza F. and Bouhlila R. Application of multivariate statistical analysis and hydrochemical and isotopic investigations for evaluation of groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and agriculture purposes: case of Oum Ali-Thelepte aquifer, central Tunisia. Environ. Monit. Assess.188:135-146 (2016).
10. Huang G., Chen Z. and Sun J. Water quality assessment and hydrochemical characteristics of shallow groundwater in eastern Chancheng district, Foshan, China. Water. Environ. Res. 2: 354–362 (2013).
11. Gibbs R.J. Mechanisms controlling world’s water chemistry. Science 170: 1088–1090 (1970).
12. Wang X., Zhou X., Zhao J., Zheng Y., Song C., Long M. and Chen T.  Hydrochemical evolution and reaction simulation of travertine deposition of the Lianchangping hot springs in Yunnan, China. Quatern. Int. 18: 1–14 (2016).
13. Pasvanoglu, S. Hydrogeochemistry of thermal and mineralized waters in the Diyadin (Agri) area, Eastern Turkey. Appl. Geochem. 38: 70–81(2014).
14. Hounslow A.W. Water quality data: analysis and interpretation. CRC Lewis Publishers, Florida (1995).
15. Pratheepa V., Ramesh S., Sukumaran, N. and Murugesan, A.G. Identification of the sources for groundwater salinization in the coastal aquifers of Southern Tamil Nadu, India. Environ.Earth.Sci. 4: 2819–2829 (2015).
16. Jankowski J. and Acworth R.I. Impact of debris-flow deposits on hydrogeochemical processes and the development of dryland salinity in the Yass River catchment, New South Wales, Australia. Hydrogeol. J. 5: 71–88 (1997).
17. Ledesma-Ruiza R., Pastén-Zapataa E., Parraa, R., Harterb, T. and Mahlknecht J. Investigation of the geochemical evolution of groundwater under agricultural land: A case study in northeastern Mexico. J. Hydrol. 521:  410–423 (2015).
18. Schoeller H. Les eaux souterraines Massio et Cie, Paris, France (1962).
19. Alcalá F.J. and Custodio E. Using the Cl/Br ratio as a tracer to identify the origin of salinity in aquifers in Spain and Portugal. J. Hydro. 359: 189–207 (2008).
20. Parkhurst D.L. and Appelo C.A.J. User's guide to PHREEQC – A computer program for speciation, reaction-path, 1D-transport, and inverse geochemical calculations: Technical Report 99-4259. US Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado (1999).
21. Selvakumar S., Ramkumar K., Chandrasekar N., Magesh N.S. and Kaliraj K. Groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and irrigational use in the Southern Tiruchirappalli district, Tamil Nadu, India. Appl.Water. Sci. doi: 10.1007/s13201-014-0256-9 (2014).
22. Kavab Engineering Consultants. A report on prohibition of water abstraction within Ravar plain. p.160 (2010).
23.  Karimzadeh A., Aminizadeh Bazanjani M.R. Scrutiny of Feasibility of Implementation for Underground Dam in the Margin of Desert for Land Farming (Case Study, Kerman (Ravar) Underground Dam). IJABBR. 1: 1129-1141 (2013).